Protection against malware and scansĪvast’s ability to keep you safe against malware is not even across the board. So Bitdefender wins the protection battle by a hair. But Bitdefender’s defensive feature list is more extensive, giving it a slight advantage over Avast. So they will offer you essentially the same degree of security. And that is why false positives are a thing to keep in mind.ĭata published by AV-TEST Institute gives both antiviruses a 5.5 on macOS and six on Windows in the protection department. A good antivirus will remove harmful files without altering the system’s legitimate data. Detecting and removing malware is necessary but not sufficient. Overall winner: Bitdefender Who is the best protector, Avast or Bitdefender?Īn antivirus’s capacity to offer protection is obviously one of its most essential features, but it’s also among the hardest to measure accurately. Still, only Avast is available for Linux systems – if you are wondering how Bitdefender can have an Android version, which is nothing than a highly customized Linux distro by Google and not a version for desktop Linux computers, you’re not alone, but the answer remains a mystery. Both cover the most used operating systems globally. The license is 18 USD per year for Bitdefender and 35 USD for Avast. The essential information is that, as already stated, both programs have free versions. ![]() Once you’ve read this, you’ll know which is the right option for you and why. In this article, we will compare Bitdefender with Avast and look at the pros and cons of each one. Both products are well-known and respected, offering free versions to the public. But Avast is a mammoth industry player that eats other, smaller antivirus companies and technologies and blends them into its service. ![]() If there were anything like a consensus about the best antivirus service, Bitdefender would probably be the chosen one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |